Showing posts with label Post-PC Era. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Post-PC Era. Show all posts

Monday, March 19, 2012

6 Stocks that Could Profit from the Natural Gas Revolution

I've received quite a few emails recently from my Scarcity & Real Wealthsubscribers regarding hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. It's clear that many of them have been reading up on the subject.
And they should. Because even with stricter regulatory burdens on the horizon, this could well be the most profitable and rewarding subsector of the entire energy universe.
In order to understand why, let me take you back a few years in order to understand where we once stood on the natural gas landscape.
"The era of inexpensive natural gas is over."
Back in 2005, Hurricane Rita struck the Texas coast, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) released the Xbox 360 console, the Chicago White Sox won the World Series, and the United States seemed to be running out of natural gas.
At least, that's what everybody thought.
Gas supplies were dwindling, and the only hope for meeting the U.S.'s growing need appeared to be purchases from overseas. In fact, liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports had surged nearly 30% the prior year, and companies were investing heavily in new import terminals.
In its annual report to shareholders, Chenier Energy (NYSE: LNG) boldly declared "the era of inexpensive North American gas is over." So investors and consumers braced for a day when domestic natural gas reserves ran dry and incoming tankers hauled in supplies from distant lands.
That day never came.
It turns out the United States isn't running out of natural gas -- it is actually swimming in it. It won't need to borrow from its neighbors. Quite the opposite. Stockpiles are overflowing with surplus supply that can be sold overseas. So those import terminals are now being converted to export facilities.
That's an amazing 180-degree turnaround in a relatively short period of time. So what happened? Did somebody suddenly discover the lar! gest gas reservoir this side of Qatar? Not exactly.
The credit for the natural gas revolution belongs almost entirely to one of the most controversial -- yet indisputably successful -- drilling techniques ever devised: hydraulic fracturing.
Whether you love it or hate it, one thing is for sure -- you better not ignore it.
A 100-Year Supply of Fuel
The Energy Information Agency (EIA) now believes there is a staggering 2,543 trillion cubic feet of recoverable gas in the United States. The country burns about 25 trillion cubic feet a year, give or take. So that inventory means we have ample supply on hand to last for the next century.
Notice I emphasized the word "recoverable."
Much of North America's oil and gas is locked within geologically challenging formations such as the Barnett Shale in Dallas, the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania, and the Eagle Ford Shale in south Texas, just to name a few.
These aren't new discoveries. In most cases, geologists and energy producers have known about these fields for decades. But knowing the gas is there and actually recovering it from two or three miles below the surface are two very different things. That's particularly true when the gas is trapped inside dense rock and can't move.
The productivity of a reservoir is determined largely by two factors: porosity and permeability. The more porous, the more empty space available to store oil and gas. And the more permeable, the easier fluid can flow through and be captured. Some prolific oil fields have porosities of 30%.
But shales are a whole different ballgame. In North Dakota's Bakken play, porosity is just 5% (95% rock). So while there is plenty of oil, bringing it to the surface is a daunting task. Oil men have been hunting in this region as far back as 1951. Most had nothing but dry holes to show for their efforts.
The same problem frustrated energy companies trying to tap into tight formations all around the! country . Hydraulic fracturing proved to be the answer to this vexing problem.
The facts on fracking
Fracking involves pumping high-pressure fluids deep below ground to fracture the rock and prop it open. The procedure creates a network of tiny cracks that can stretch hundreds of feet, providing a pathway for oil and gas to flow into the well bore.
In a nutshell, fracking helps artificially create the fissures and channels that Mother Nature put in conventional reservoirs. This technological breakthrough has made it possible to efficiently drain hydrocarbons from basins that were previously considered inaccessible and out of bounds.
Fracking has technically been around since the 1940s. But like most technologies, it has improved dramatically over time. The practice really took off about a decade ago when pioneers paired it with horizontal drilling in the Barnett Shale. The results were nothing short of amazing.
In just 10 years, Barnett production zoomed from nothing to five billion cubic feet (Bcf) of gas per day. Incidentally, it took just three years for fracking crews and producers to reach the same production milestone in Louisiana's Haynesville Shale -- so we continue to perfect the process.
Investment opportunities abound
Despite potential environmental drawbacks, there's no denying that hydraulic fracturing is a boon for the energy industry.
Shale gas now accounts for one-third of the nation's overall gas production, a 30-fold increase since 2000. And don't forget about oil. Following the widespread introduction of fracking, the Bakken Shale produced 113 million barrels in 2010. That's more in one year than the cumulative total from the prior 55 years combined.
That's what fracking can do.
No wonder just about every unconventional gas well undergoes multi-stage fracking services these days. And it isn't cheap. By some estimates, fracking can account for up to 30% of the total dri! lling an d completion cost of a well -- even more in busy shales. Yet companies still can't keep pace with demand.
Just look at Frac-Tech, which is partially owned by Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK). Last year, the company reported that every one of its service units had been deployed in the field, without a day off, since November 2009. And through the first half of 2011, revenue surged 143% from a year earlier to crack the $1 billion mark.
And that's just in the United States. Don't think for a second that we're the only country with untapped shale resources. Bloomberg estimates that China holds 1,275 trillion cubic feet of shale gas reserves. And Canada holds vast supplies of oil and gas inside the Horn River basin and other spots.
Fracking is the key that unlocks these geologic treasure chests.
In the table below, I've listed a few prospects that warrant further research by investors.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Why Did My Stock Just Die?

The markets dropped yesterday as the supercommittee for deficit reduction couldn't reach a compromise, meaning that $1.2 trillion in spending cuts kicks in -- in 2013! So the politicians punted responsibility till after the upcoming elections, and your stock took a nosedive, but don't panic. First, let's see whether it had good reason to fall. Sometimes, panic-fueled drops can make excellent buying opportunities. Here's the latest crop of cratered stocks that could provide a possibility for profit:
Stock
CAPS Rating (out of 5)
Monday's Change
Focus Media (Nasdaq: FMCN  )
**
(39.5%)
VanceInfo Technologies (NYSE: VIT  )
**
(18.4%)
Sify Technologies (Nasdaq: SIFY  )
**
(15.8%)
With the Dow falling almost 250 points yesterday, or 2.1%, stocks that went down by even larger percentages are pretty big deals.
Muddying the waters
It's no fun owning a stock accused of financial shenanigans -- just ask me, I own Bio-Reference Labs (Nasdaq: BRLI  ) , which was the target of a two-part Street Sweeper expose. Now, though, Focus Media is facing what appears to be some nitty-gritty, down-in-the-numbers analysis alleging that the company has engaged in fraud.
Short-selling firm Mudd! y Waters took aim at the Chinese media outfit and declared it was "fraudulently overstating" its numbers while insiders were running the company for their own benefit. Specifically, Muddy Waters alleges Focus Media overstates the number of LCD screens in its network by 50% while overpaying for a string of acquisitions that it then wrote down on its financial statements as a means of hiding losses.
Focus Media certainly isn't the only Chinese company to face allegations of fraud. Muddy Waters itself has questioned several, including Orient Paper and Spreadtrum Communications (Nasdaq: SPRD  ) , about their financials. Earlier this month, Citron Research, another high-profile short-seller, attacked Chinese Internet company Qihoo 360 Technology (NYSE: QIHU  ) -- an attack that Qihoo didn't hesitate to fight back on.
Although 94% of those CAPS members rating Focus Media think it would outperform the broad market averages, its low two-star rating suggests they believe there are better places for your money. The most recent comments highlight the Muddy Waters report, underscoring one fund manager's view that "if I see a sell recommendation from Muddy Waters, I'm going to sell and ask questions later."
Add Focus Media to your watchlist to watch as it fights back -- if it can -- against the allegations.
Can we outsource losses?
A week after Chinese IT outsourcing specialist VanceInfo Technologies was punished by the market for rehiring the auditor who has been at the heart of some of those scandalized Chinese companies -- Deloitte was the auditor for Longtop Financial -- it posted some encouraging third-quarter results that helped boost shares by more than 40%. The market did beat back the stock somewhat, perhaps in light of the Focus Media allegations. Call it a tarnished halo effect, as I found no company-specific news to account for the drop.
Or may be it fell in sympathy with Sify Technologies, which was beaten down over the widening scope of the MF Global bankruptcy. As the amount of investor losses at the trading firm mounts to $1.2 billion, investors are worried about the relationship Sify has with MF Global in a joint venture in India.
The Indian IT specialist was flying high earlier this month after its own third-quarter results came in strong, and as its enterprise segment -- Sify's largest -- experienced 7.5% growth from the year-ago period. While its smaller commercial and consumer segment that houses its broadband access and cyber cafe business withers, which could be problematic for Internet portal Rediff.com (Nasdaq: REDF  ) , the main engine of growth for Sify was still intact.
Like Focus Media, both VanceInfo and Sify have strong CAPS community support (90% and 91%, respectively) that they will outperform the broad market averages. Yet, both also sport low ratings just like the outdoor advertiser, meaning whatever hopes they had for their future were tepid at best.
Tell us on the CAPS pages of both VanceInfo Technologies and Sify Technologies if you think they'll bounce back from here, and follow their progress by adding them to the Fool's free portfolio tracker.
Ready for a resurrection
Just because your stock has taken a beating, that doesn't mean it's going to roll over and die. Markets are�known for overreacting. A closer look on�Motley Fool CAPS�at what's happened to your stock can give you an edge over other investors who just react to the market's lead. With CAPS, you can decide for yourself whether your stock ready to come back from the dead.